Supreme Court

Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on SC/ST Sub-Classification

What's In This Article

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has allowed the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) for the purpose of reservation benefits. This decision, delivered by a seven-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing efforts to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits among the most disadvantaged sections of society.

The Ruling

The bench, in a 6:1 majority verdict, held that sub-classification within SCs and STs is permissible. This ruling overruled the earlier judgment in the E.V. Chinnaiah case, which had prohibited such sub-classification on the grounds that it would violate the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution12. The court emphasized that Article 341 does not create a homogenous class among SCs and that sub-classification is necessary to ensure that the benefits of reservation reach the most marginalized within these communities1.

download 43
Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on SC/ST Sub-Classification 3

Chief Justice’s Message

CJI Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, who authored the majority opinion, highlighted the importance of this decision in addressing the disparities within the SC and ST categories. He noted that the ruling aims to rectify the historical injustices faced by the most disadvantaged groups within these communities. The Chief Justice underscored that the sub-classification would enable states to tailor their reservation policies more effectively, ensuring that the benefits are not monopolized by relatively better-off sections within the SC/ST categories13.

Implications of the Ruling

This landmark judgment empowers states to identify and exclude the “creamy layer” within SCs and STs from reservation benefits, a principle previously applied only to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). By doing so, the court aims to ensure that the most disadvantaged segments within these communities receive the intended benefits of affirmative action2.

The ruling has been met with mixed reactions. Proponents argue that it is a necessary step towards achieving true social justice, while critics fear it may lead to further fragmentation within the SC/ST categories. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court’s decision is a significant move towards addressing the inequalities that persist within India’s reservation system.

OIG2.z
Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on SC/ST Sub-Classification 4

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s decision to allow sub-classification within SCs and STs represents a crucial step in the ongoing quest for social justice in India. By enabling more targeted distribution of reservation benefits, the ruling seeks to uplift the most marginalized sections of these communities, ensuring that the promise of affirmative action is fulfilled more equitably.

Picture of Yash Khaskalam

Yash Khaskalam

Author at KhasVakil
yashkhaskalam@khasvakil.in

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
temp mail
temp mail
2 months ago

There is definately a lot to find out about this subject. I like all the points you made

You May Also Read

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Contact KhasVakil - Support