Supreme Court Grants Bail to Manish Sisodia in Delhi Excise Policy Case

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Manish Sisodia in Delhi Excise Policy Case

What's In This Article

The Supreme Court has granted bail to former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia in the Delhi excise policy case. The court emphasized the importance of personal liberty and the right to a speedy trial, noting that Sisodia had been held for over 17 months without trial on money laundering charges.

A bench of Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan highlighted that bail cannot be used as a form of punishment and should not be withheld if the state cannot ensure a speedy trial. The court observed that Sisodia has deep roots in society, making it unlikely for him to flee, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses.

Emphasis on Personal Liberty and Speedy Trial

The Supreme Court has granted bail to former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, highlighting the importance of personal liberty and the right to a speedy trial. Sisodia had been held for over 17 months without trial on money laundering charges related to the Delhi excise policy.

Bench Highlights Right to Bail

A bench comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and K.V. Viswanathan emphasized that bail cannot be used as a form of punishment. They noted that if the state cannot ensure a speedy trial, it should not withhold bail based on the seriousness of the alleged crime.

No Risk of Fleeing or Tampering with Evidence

The court observed that Sisodia has deep roots in society, making it unlikely for him to flee, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses.

Bail Conditions and Court’s Observations

Sisodia’s release was ordered upon payment of ₹10 lakh in bail bonds. He is required to surrender his passport and report to the police station every Monday. The court declined the plea from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to bar Sisodia from the Delhi Secretariat.

Fundamental Right to Liberty

Justice Gavai, who authored the verdict, stated that keeping Sisodia incarcerated indefinitely in the hope of a speedy trial violates his fundamental right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The court noted that there was no possibility of the trial concluding in the near future, given the extensive list of witnesses and documents involved in the case.

Picture of Yash Khaskalam

Yash Khaskalam

Author at KhasVakil
yashkhaskalam@khasvakil.in

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

You May Also Read

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x

Contact KhasVakil - Support